From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.96.70.73 with SMTP id k9csp23135qdu; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:49:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.73.137 with SMTP id l9mr14328168oev.32.1384098541022; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:49:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nk3si8813349obb.154.2013.11.10.07.49.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sdothum@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sdothum@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sdothum@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e14so6166677iej.39 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:49:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IVAuGbF5M8sI/Vl6fvii8jVUoWTaLeTw80c/Sqd2Vkk=; b=eRRfFFm+AMNOCQ4g1cv08kyDxDXWnr1xw4xtszLRGO17x+1YcDXFJd7GecxCKJaoS1 DEOhSiSLOUDKuLhFX5Qp9zEjQNoKtd4efMcLgCC+0SS6NyfphxBTFuddDHYChOBjfl5r K9aytQVBOWoAS7mDpbhWiUBOyTcS9FHdBChPAuENTaSO4YWZesxFrMB5KLiFerRP+kwN VLzede8PdX9EhWigKNZREC6k870NohyP7cHZcJfvqa+H/PSADBJRB1HgQF3y4OFm4A5s sUTVTvwvrRb19MY6CX2vtlrVaEY7WdAAul1c+iKBGq8gXHVxhzGJFWihTmUfuEw72RbY px7w== X-Received: by 10.50.4.9 with SMTP id g9mr9878781igg.22.1384098123099; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:42:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from localhost (dsl-173-206-16-199.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.16.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm14694694igi.0.2013.11.10.07.42.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:42:02 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Steven Hum To: Gaute Hope Cc: sup-devel Subject: Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15? In-reply-to: <1383637745-sup-2758@qwerzila> References: <1383637745-sup-2758@qwerzila> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 10:42:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1384097900-sup-2821@luna> User-Agent: Sup/0.14.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Gaute, I did a gem install of 0.15.0 on a Debian Sid system and got this error: --- RuntimeError from thread: load threads for thread-index-mode invalid source 13 /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:237:in `block in build_message' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:235:in `map' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:235:in `build_message' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `block (2 levels) in each_id_by_date' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:338:in `call' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:338:in `block in load_n_threads' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `block in each_id_by_date' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `block in each_id' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `each' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `each_id' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `each_id_by_date' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:334:in `load_n_threads' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/modes/thread_index_mode.rb:674:in `load_n_threads' (eval):12:in `load_n_threads' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/modes/thread_index_mode.rb:658:in `block in load_n_threads_background' /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup.rb:87:in `block in reporting_thread' Gem version 0.14.1.1 works fine on Debian Sid (rmail did not appear to be installed with 0.15.0 but that doesn't seem to be related to the above error). Regards, Steven Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2013-11-05 02:51:42 -0500: > hi there, > > any objections to releasing sup 0.15 (I figured it deserves a whole new > version number!) with maildir-syncback as it is now? Is it ready to be > released into the wild? > > (maildir-syncback is now in 'develop' - go ahead and test if you > haven't) > > Cheers, Gaute > -- "Truth or die." Steven Hum 5 - 28 Gilmour St Ottawa, ON K2P 0N3 email sdothum@gmail.com tel 613.237.9058