[sup-devel] Failure joining threads

* [sup-devel] Failure joining threads
@ 2011-11-22 18:40 Сергей  
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Сергей   @ 2011-11-22 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sup-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 723 bytes --]

Hello there,

'#' key sometimes do not join tagged threads in thread-index-mode. And I am not
the only one who encountered this problem.

I attach the mbox file with two messages I cannot join into one thread. Could
someone else try to reproduce the bug with this mbox, please?

Reproducing (in just-installed sup environment):

1. Type:
$ sup-add mbox:/.../failed_join.mbox
$ sup

Two one-message threads are in my inbox at the moment. And it looks like it
should be one thread with two messages instead.

2. Press sequentally tt#

Threads are now untagged but not joined.
Nothing appears in status line or log file.

I have sup-0.12.1 installed from 'xarthisius' overlay on gentoo linux.

Thanx

-- 
Сергей (Serge)

[-- Attachment #2: failed_join.mbox --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 6921 bytes --]

From news@gmane.org Tue Mar 04 03:33:20 2003
From: Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:31:20 +0300
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <b116b61ce6e0ef5f30f5d3260493fc9f@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
References: <adea9ecc7d234f563928bae9878a65d2@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
Reply-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: <gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
X-From: gentoo-scm+bounces-292-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org Sat Nov 05 20:31:33 2011
Return-path: <gentoo-scm+bounces-292-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
Envelope-to: glgs-gentoo-scm@m.gmane.org
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-scm+bounces-292-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>)
	id 1RMlxk-0007HD-MR
	for glgs-gentoo-scm@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 20:31:32 +0100
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10B7421C023;
	Sat,  5 Nov 2011 19:31:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Delivered-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Received: from omrb.pnpi.spb.ru (omrb.pnpi.spb.ru [195.19.214.195])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B37221C023
	for <gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>; Sat,  5 Nov 2011 19:31:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from omrb.pnpi.spb.ru (omrb.pnpi.spb.ru [195.19.214.195])
	by omrb.pnpi.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE595B651
	for <gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>; Sat,  5 Nov 2011 23:31:20 +0400 (MSK)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-scm+help-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-scm+unsubscribe-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-scm+subscribe-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: Gentoo SCM discussions <gentoo-scm.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-scm-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
In-Reply-To: <adea9ecc7d234f563928bae9878a65d2-heEE5zn7HfaV8fSEjHp0FA@public.gmane.org>
X-Sender: alexxy-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.scm-migration/113>

Hi all!

Any progress on this topic?

portage already has thin manifest and some king of changelog generation 
functionality.
what else we need to proceed with migration?

PS there were no updates in tracker bug
-- 
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev
mailto:alexxyum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
mailto:alexxy-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
mailto:alexxy-heEE5zn7HfaV8fSEjHp0FA@public.gmane.org

From news@gmane.org Tue Mar 04 03:33:20 2003
From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 20:18:07 +0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <20111105201807.GB1846@orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <adea9ecc7d234f563928bae9878a65d2@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
Reply-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
X-From: gentoo-scm+bounces-293-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org Sat Nov 05 21:18:19 2011
Return-path: <gentoo-scm+bounces-293-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
Envelope-to: glgs-gentoo-scm@m.gmane.org
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-scm+bounces-293-glgs-gentoo-scm=m.gmane.org-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>)
	id 1RMmh0-00005Z-10
	for glgs-gentoo-scm@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 21:18:18 +0100
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D32F521C0A8;
	Sat,  5 Nov 2011 20:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Delivered-To: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FA221C0A8
	for <gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>; Sat,  5 Nov 2011 20:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B684F1B4063
	for <gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>; Sat,  5 Nov 2011 20:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 22024 invoked by uid 10000); 5 Nov 2011 20:18:07 -0000
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-scm+help-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-scm+unsubscribe-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-scm+subscribe-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: Gentoo SCM discussions <gentoo-scm.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-scm-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-scm-cnFmAm88PdgLnqt3yJz4RQ@public.gmane.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b116b61ce6e0ef5f30f5d3260493fc9f-heEE5zn7HfaV8fSEjHp0FA@public.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.scm-migration/114>

On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:31:20PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> Any progress on this topic?
> 
> portage already has thin manifest and some king of changelog generation 
> functionality.
> what else we need to proceed with migration?
> 
> PS there were no updates in tracker bug
Pending from the last update:
- commit signing
- merge policy

Commit signing is locked up in discussion on the upstream Git list.

Merge policy looks like it might be dictated by how the commit signing
goes: some of the models for signing include having explicit merge
commits that are signed.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robbat2-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread