From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.52.187.5 with SMTP id fo5cs55002vdc; Sun, 8 May 2011 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.218 with SMTP id z26mr4368102qcj.166.1304873659512; Sun, 08 May 2011 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si11515158qco.59.2011.05.08.09.54.19; Sun, 08 May 2011 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2371858372; Sun, 8 May 2011 12:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5771858367 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 12:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4504671wwd.23 for ; Sun, 08 May 2011 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:subject:from:to:date:message-id :user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QY/ZrEakccwnaSfI+OuEFhjdrTdpJtlaB1VEwS+ULk8=; b=aPnRKtilqr6cOahpAicEY4CBTHLYRq9msSvMjclY/zEKpt5hyLKTIVrOY0WCFrnpqu a5M7Q1kdKkPHg1BuOms3qlZuuMUWpXoWNWBdf0/R8r4KZFfRZ78hMfp3ayA8hKdJpfd4 ZDGFWt41eKSVU+/UJOuO2IdlV4yVv+YnreTwI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:subject:from:to:date:message-id:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding; b=WJgeyyMIPeVa+Amzp7aQ96e6RJ/pSfircJGmu/sHMnA++2Z1RQHbhfoMNg8u23UX20 3/3nYrCuiP/NsDInZ8QtTAYsEY3NxT1iuN1pyF0BO+b7D553Vc1UN1+A3mox86iRuoT5 z5OPTuEseF+LOW7i8D/GPrBQ20/c9rfHARcu0= Received: by 10.216.232.23 with SMTP id m23mr6011641weq.26.1304872563720; Sun, 08 May 2011 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc12-cmbg15-2-0-cust81.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.30.247.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f52sm2602900wes.11.2011.05.08.09.35.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 May 2011 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Hamish To: sup-devel Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 17:36:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1304872142-sup-6096@whisper> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: [sup-devel] mail gem no longer needs activesupport [was: sup-server revisited] X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Tue Feb 22 21:29:07 +0000 2011: > Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-02-22: > > Would it be time to go for https://github.com/mikel/mail now? It would be > > supported and actively developed and I really like the API. As a > > downside, depending on activesupport pulls in a whole a lot of fluff and > > using treetop may suggest that parsing might hog a little more cpu and > > memory than is absolutely necessary. > > I looked at it, but the dependency on activesupport is a dealbreaker for me. > There's no way I would pull that pile of Rails shit into Sup. Might be a bit late, but I've just noticed that they're taking the activesupport dependency out, as of mail 2.3.0 http://rubygems.org/gems/mail/versions/2.3.0 - no activesupport On github, the gemspec no longer refers to it: https://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/mail.gemspec though the Gemfile still does ... I think this is an oversight. https://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/Gemfile A couple of commits doing the work: https://github.com/mikel/mail/commit/6eb4c44a15eb1707dde60959e85e5c536ef136e2 https://github.com/mikel/mail/commit/8bea8ede624e81fb4704e66097a1c8cf35f8de8d > RMail is not great and I don't like using it, but it really is the best > thing I've found so far. I think I have whipped it into shape pretty well in > heliotrope. > > > Who would give us bindings to GMime and wrap it inside Mail API... > > I would use GMime bindings in a heartbeat. Hamish _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel