From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.229.71 with SMTP id jh7cs712icb; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.91.10 with SMTP id k10mr1283266qcm.141.1296114365971; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:46:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x11si5701372qcm.25.2011.01.26.23.46.05; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E05618583CC; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:46:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from kuovi.tilus.net (kuovi.tilus.net [80.68.89.168]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF221858317 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:31:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by kuovi.tilus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FC6F6089; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:31:38 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Tilus To: Sup developers In-reply-to: <1296054871-sup-9586@masanjin.net> References: <1295894044-sup-7965@masanjin.net> <1295896722-sup-5870@midna.zekjur.net> <1296054871-sup-9586@masanjin.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:31:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1296112974-sup-5821@tilus.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-devel] call for new maintainers X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org William Morgan, 2011-01-26 17:18: > So let's try this. Michael, Tero, Sascha, Edward, and everyone else > who's had code make it into Sup successfully... if you send me your > Gitorious usernames I'm http://gitorious.org/~terotil > All I ask is that you divide things into nice topic branches and > merge them into next but not master. Do you prefer basing feature branches to master or next? Should we prefix feature branch names to keep `git branch` more readable? They could be topic-* or feature-* or alike. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel