From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.42.217.136 with SMTP id hm8cs273843icb; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:35:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.185.129 with SMTP id co1mr15800968qab.232.1293755754381; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:35:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x6si30273594qcq.101.2010.12.30.16.35.53; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:35:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DB1167831F; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:35:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from kuovi.tilus.net (kuovi.tilus.net [80.68.89.168]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81D01858354 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:34:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by kuovi.tilus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 361B31F343; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:34:09 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Tilus To: Sup developers In-reply-to: <1293753763-sup-6661@zyrg.net> References: <1293750761-sup-3852@tilus.net> <1293753763-sup-6661@zyrg.net> Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:34:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1293755445-sup-9811@tilus.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-devel] Scrolling (with patches) X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Rich Lane, 2010-12-31 02:10: > Yeah, I've noticed how slow method_missing is and that's also a > problem with our use of Singleton in the codebase. I think we could have Singleton.method_missing actually create the methods as they are called. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel