From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by 10.204.20.129 with SMTP id f1cs179950bkb;
        Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.72.134 with SMTP id m6mr1909819bkj.163.1286538117382;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <michael@stapelberg.de>
Received: from twice-irc.de (mx2.twice-irc.de [79.140.35.195])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w20si9188644bkx.17.2010.10.08.04.41.57;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 79.140.35.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of michael@stapelberg.de) client-ip=79.140.35.195;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 79.140.35.195 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of michael@stapelberg.de) smtp.mail=michael@stapelberg.de
Received: from midna.zekjur.net (midna.zekjur.net [IPv6:2001:4d88:1008:4242:21c:c0ff:fe7e:4776])
	by twice-irc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EBED1665C3;
	Fri,  8 Oct 2010 13:41:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by midna.zekjur.net (Postfix, from userid 101)
	id 70C9830B416; Fri,  8 Oct 2010 13:41:55 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Michael Stapelberg <michael+sup@stapelberg.de>
To: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
Cc: Sup developer discussion <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>, Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re:_[sup-devel]_[PATCH]_Bugfix:_Don=E2=80=99t_display_thread_participants_twice?=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=Ppaa6jA=pKOeLPEVhhqjvDg1-cS7QUsmZ+QYK@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1286471713-sup-9575@midna.zekjur.net> <1286511449-sup-7198@zyrg.net> <AANLkTi=Ppaa6jA=pKOeLPEVhhqjvDg1-cS7QUsmZ+QYK@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:41:55 +0200
Message-Id: <1286538002-sup-2671@midna.zekjur.net>
User-Agent: Sup/git
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Gaute,

Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2010-10-08 12:05:29 +0200:
> What if someone has the same name ? ;) Is it more
> important/likely/intuitive than anyone using two addresses?
If two people have exactly the same name, you would not benefit in seeing that
same name twice, either. Even if one mail of the thread is new and one "Michael
S." is highlighted, you still would not know which one sent the new mail. So,
to avoid confusion about the same name showing up twice, I decided it would be
better to not show duplicates at all.

Best regards,
Michael