Re: [sup-devel] email threading - tree vs. graph

From: Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
To: W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>
Cc: Sup developer discussion <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-devel] email threading - tree vs. graph
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:27:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275538158-sup-1305@zyrg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525185026.GA11947@thialfi.home.net>

Excerpts from W. Trevor King's message of 2010-05-25 14:50:27 -0400:
> I got some good feedback from Nicolas Pouillard on the Python tidbit I
> posted, but after waiting optimisticly for some enterprising Rubist to
> port it to Ruby and merge it into Sup, I've finally taught myself
> enough Ruby to do it myself ;).  Here's DAG-supporting Sup (+ a few
> glaring documentation updates)

Thanks for the doc updates, I've applied them to master.

I'm not yet convinced that supporting multiple parents is worth
the complexity. How often do you get mails like this? What mail clients
have UI for replying to multiple messages? I'd have to fake up some
messages to actually see the full DAG support in action, so could you
post a screenshot of your code viewing a thread where the new display
helps?

> We could also resurect the old indentation-style display in the thread
> viewer, if people dislike my tig-style ascii graph.

Actually, I think the tig-style display is very interesting and could be
useful even without the generic graph support.
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel