From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.103.168.9 with SMTP id v9cs9594muo; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.110.132 with SMTP id n4mr1077305qap.55.1269499431355; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 33si587434qyk.96.2010.03.24.23.43.50; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D14918582DC; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:43:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kuovi.tilus.net (kuovi.tilus.net [80.68.89.168]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DDA18582CB for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kuovi.tilus.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BED36011; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:25:21 +0200 (EET) From: Tero Tilus To: sup-devel In-reply-to: <1269275101-sup-1611@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1269012878-sup-691@midna.zekjur.net> <1269257324-sup-3868@midna.zekjur.net> <1269275101-sup-1611@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:25:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1269497979-sup-4663@tilus.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Use nanosecond resolution of mtime for generating the unique id for each message X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Ben Walton, 2010-03-22 18:25: > So we're still needing ruby 1.9 and ext4 then? That's a deal > breaker for me. I'm with Ben in this. I'll need to be able to do without them both for quite a while. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel