From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.86.59.13 with SMTP id h13cs278574fga; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.63.214 with SMTP id c22mr609394qai.22.1267219514078; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si85649qwe.36.2010.02.26.13.25.13; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674A11858300; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:25:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from pion.club.cc.cmu.edu (PION.CLUB.CC.cmu.edu [128.237.157.88]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D5218582D2 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:24:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from rlane by pion.club.cc.cmu.edu with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nl7fM-0005YQ-2u; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:24:08 -0500 From: Rich Lane To: Michael Stapelberg In-reply-to: <1266493070-sup-7733@midna.zekjur.net> References: <1266493070-sup-7733@midna.zekjur.net> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:24:08 -0500 Message-Id: <1267219197-sup-2428@zyrg.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Cc: sup-devel Subject: Re: [sup-devel] [PATCH] Implement inline GPG X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from Michael Stapelberg's message of 2010-02-18 06:40:45 -0500: > Hi, > > as my previous patch was not merged, I have updated the patch to apply against > the current code. Furthermore, it now correctly handles character sets for the > GPG encrypted part. > > The patch has been tested by me and another user and seems to work fine. > > Please merge it for the next release. > > Best regards, > Michael Not a full review yet, just a bug that bit me: message.rb:531 assumes the text will be on its own line, while the regex on 530 does not. (check my edge branch for line numbers) _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel