From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.213.28.69 with SMTP id l5cs342556ebc; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.42.148 with SMTP id s20mr409628qae.281.1263769977372; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:12:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si3205597qwb.32.2010.01.17.15.12.57; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:12:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B241318582F3; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:12:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C543A18582EC for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:12:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NWeIc-000637-IZ for sup-devel@rubyforge.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:12:51 -0500 From: William Morgan To: sup-devel In-reply-to: <1262795751-sup-4525@masanjin.net> References: <1262634342-7029-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> <1262729069-sup-2235@masanjin.net> <1262795751-sup-4525@masanjin.net> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:12:50 -0500 Message-Id: <1263769911-sup-6744@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-devel] [PATCH] only open mail files in binary mode on Ruby 1.9 X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2010-01-06: > The internet claims that using "rb" and "wb" works for both 1.8.5 and > 1.9.1, but I haven't tried it. I've done this in ruby-1.9-encodings and remerged into next. Those of you tracking next with 1.9, please let me know if you experience any weird encoding errors. (And those with 1.8, as well, I suppose.) -- William _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel