From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.213.28.69 with SMTP id l5cs336515ebc; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.69.154 with SMTP id z26mr922976qai.67.1263760888522; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:41:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si2955306qwb.52.2010.01.17.12.41.28; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1518582E4; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:41:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CE118582D4 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NWbug-0002NC-Gk for sup-devel@rubyforge.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 From: William Morgan To: sup-devel In-reply-to: <1263754247-20979-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> References: <1263754247-20979-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1263760710-sup-5382@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-devel] RFC: Nuke remote sources X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2010-01-17: > Every few days someone joins the IRC channel complaining of poor > performance or bugs with IMAP sources, and we have to tell them to use > offlineimap or fetchmail instead. I think this is a great idea. I'm sick of the same thing happening on the mailing list. I actually currently use a plain IMAP source successfully, but it's just a matter of time before it will start bogging down. > If people agree that this change is a good idea, I assume William will > add a deprecation notice to master for 0.10 and merge this patchset to > next. Yeah, another thing to add to 0.10... sigh. -- William _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel