Subject: [sup-talk] gpg signatures are not valid of sig present

From: [email-masked] (Jan Spakula)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 23:42:10 -0500

Hello,

I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are
not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients
(tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature. With
no signature present, all works fine. Sup can verify the signature
succesfully in either case though. (I'm using sup 0.5.)

I'm sorry, I'm no ruby programmer, so I don't know where the problem
could be; just by common sense it would seem that ruby strips the
message of the signature before dealing with gpg sig.

Thanks for help,

-- 
 Jan

---

From: [email-masked] (William Morgan)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:41:46 -0700

Reformatted excerpts from Jan Spakula's message of 2008-05-15:
> (tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature.

Turns out this was a newline issue. I think I've tracked it down. Do a
git pull and try again.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>

---

From: [email-masked] (Jan Spakula)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:04:39 -0500

> Turns out this was a newline issue. I think I've tracked it down. Do a

Works now. Thanks for the fix!

-- 
 Jan