Subject: [sup-talk] Refreshing inbox & removing +inbox label

From: [email-masked] (Alexander Panek)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:08:00 +0200

Hello,

I've got two questions:

- Is there a way to refresh the inbox, so labels are re-read (removing
the +inbox label doesn't quite hide the threads from inbox - I have to
restart sup to make it work..)?

- Is there any easy way to hide threads from the inbox without removing
the inbox label on a per-thread basis? Something like "tag
all" threads in current view and making ";l" able to not only add, but
also remove tags would be sufficiant for me. 
That'd be very handy for high traffic accounts where you actually only
want to check occasionally, without having them flooding your inbox.

Thanks in advance!
-- 
Alexander Panek <alexander.panek at brainsware.org>

---

From: [email-masked] (Alexander Panek)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:31:10 +0200

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:08:00 +0200
Alexander Panek <alexander.panek at brainsware.org> wrote:
> [...] Something like "tag
> all" threads in current view [...].

I've just seen there's another thread with a patch to achieve this. So
now the only thing left would be inbox/view reloading and removing
labels on all tagged threads.

---

From: [email-masked] (Christopher Warrington)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:49:50 -0500

> restart sup to make it work..)?

In SVN, pressing @ (in 0.1, I think is is D) when in an index-mode
re-executes the query. Any unsaved changes will be lost, so you probably
want to save them first with $.

-- 
Christopher Warrington <chrisw at rice.edu>

---

From: [email-masked] (William Morgan)
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:41:17 -0700

> restart sup to make it work..)?

'@' will refresh. Also, I assume you were changing the labels in
thread-view-mode, which was slightly broken until recently---this should
be fixed in SVN (0.2 has a bug, sigh), and everything you do in either
mode should be reflected immediately in all buffers.

> - Is there any easy way to hide threads from the inbox without
> removing the inbox label on a per-thread basis? Something like "tag
> also remove tags would be sufficiant for me.  That'd be very handy for
> high traffic accounts where you actually only want to check
> occasionally, without having them flooding your inbox.

I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean. What label would you
remove, if you could remove from multiple threads?

High-traffic mail that you only want to check occasionally should be
handled by keeping them in an auto-archived source with an
automatically-applied label, and then selecting that label. I read
ruby-talk that way, for example.

-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>