Subject: [sup-talk] new in svn: gpg signature verification

From: [email-masked] (William Morgan)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:55:43 -0700

Still highly experimental, but if you have gpg or pgp in your path, you
should now see a notice at the top of each signed message saying that
the signature was good, bad, or unknown. Please let me know how this
works, particularly if it claims a signature is bad when it actually
isn't. (Figuring out exactly how to format the signed payload such that
gpg/pgp accepts it has been non-trivial.)

-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>

---

From: [email-masked] (Magnus Therning)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:35:42 +0100

>gpg/pgp accepts it has been non-trivial.)

Seems to work like a charm :-)

Once signing of message is added I can start reading _and_ writing mail
in sup.  And when it has support for encrypted emails (sending &
receiving) then mutt is history!

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                             (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus?therning?org             Jabber: magnus?therning?gmail?com
http://therning.org/magnus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20070915/3087d189/attachment.bin