Subject: Re: [sup-talk] fun stuff in git next

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:05:26 -0500

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Fri Jan 01 16:48:15 -0500 2010:
> Thanks to inestimable Rich Lane, we have two particularly exciting
> things happening now in git next:

Happy news! I'll upgrade shortly.

Cheers,
Edward
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: William Morgan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:48:15 -0800

1. Autosave. No more hitting '$' in thread-view-mode. (Actually hitting
'$' will now send you to the bottom of the buffer.)

2. Ruby 1.9 support. There are a few warts here and there, but it works!
You will need either Xapian or the special compiled-for-1.9 Ferret gem
that's been floating around for this.

Those of you following git master will also notice a bunch of new
features that have been merged down from next, in preparation for the
0.10 release.
-- 
William <[email-masked]>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: Rich Lane <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:36:12 -0500

Excerpts from Richard Sandilands's message of Fri Jan 01 23:27:25 -0500 2010:
> I'm getting the following error after pulling next:
> 
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/sup-999/lib/sup/util.rb:520:in `send':
> undefined method `stop_sync_worker' for
> #<Redwood::XapianIndex:0x101fd15b8> (NoMethodError)
>     from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/sup-999/lib/sup/util.rb:520:in
> `method_missing'
>     from /Users/richard/src/mainline/bin/sup:350

It looks like you're using the lib/ directory of an older installed gem.
Make sure you have -I./lib (or the correct path to your sup lib dir) in
your ruby arguments when running your git working copy.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: Richard Sandilands <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:27:25 +1100