Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup and ruby 1.9

From: Philipp Überbacher <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:04:29 +0200

Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2010-10-26 01:06:51 +0200:
> Hello all
> 
> I'm wondering what the status of sup and ruby 1.9 is. Is it stable and
> no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on
> ruby 1.8?
> 
> If I did go for the change, can I switch back and forth between ruby
> versions? Should I reinstall all the gems that sup depends on?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Hamish

All I can tell you is that sup 0.11 works with ruby 1.9.1_p429 but
breaks with 1.9.2.

_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: Michael Stapelberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:06:25 +0200

Hi Hamish,

> no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on
It works just fine. I run it since a few months without any problems. For ruby
1.9.2, you need some patches:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/2010-September/004223.html

> versions? Should I reinstall all the gems that sup depends on?
Yes, you need to install all gems.

Best regards,
Michael

---

From: Hamish D <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:06:51 +0100

Hello all

Thanks in advance
Hamish

---

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:45:02 +0200

> > no more buggy than on ruby 1.8? Is it significantly faster than on

I myself have 1.8 installed in /opt and use it for running sup. My distro
(arch) likes upgrading to beta-versions way too much, and I want my mailclient
to be stable ;)
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk