Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Behavior for sent messages

From: Matias Aguirre <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:49:40 -0200

I didn't dug on this one, but I can confirm behavior difference, I
liked previous one and noticed immediately. Just adding my vote here.

Thanks,
Matías

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Fri Oct 29 21:29:55 -0200 2010:
> Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of Fri Oct 29 19:00:08 -0400 2010:
> > I just noticed that when I replied, the thread appeared to inbox and
> > disappeared when I refreshed (hit @) the inbox buffer.
> 
> That's quite interesting :-)  I haven't had time to dig into this, but
> a verification is good to hear.
> 
> Edward
--
Matías Aguirre <[email-masked]>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:56:11 -0400

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Sun Aug 15 19:58:03 -0400 2010:
> I've tracked down the regression to this merge: 45c3433c0 Merge remote branch 'origin/maildir'
> 
> I'd appreciate a quick san-check before I start investigating the merge more
> closely: you can easily test for this bug by renaming your .sup directory away
> and creating a fresh sup directory.

Hello,

Has anyone been able to reproduce this bug on the relevant commit?

Edward

---

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:29:55 -0400

Edward

---

From: Philipp Überbacher <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:00:06 +0200

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of 2010-07-31 05:28:44 +0200:
> Does anyone know when the default behavior for sent messages became
> 'Archive automatically'?  I've found keeping then in the inbox was
> a good reminder for following up in the case of lack of response,
> so at least making this configurable would be nice.
> 
> Cheers,
> Edward

They are kept in the inbox with 0.11. All I know.
-- 
Philipp

--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu
und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan

---

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:28:44 -0400

Cheers,
Edward

---

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:06:34 -0400

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Sat Jul 31 07:25:38 -0400 2010:
> I'm running pretty close to the tip of git/next and that's not the
> behaviour here.  There are times, when using Maildir that the sent
> message doesn't get added immediately, but it always pops up at the
> next poll.

Hello Ben,

I tested your hypothesis and noted that the messages did not pop up
with a poll.

Since this behavior does not seem intentional, I guess it's a regression
caused by some combination of factors (possibly the new backsync branch?)
I'll try to reproduce on a clean Maildir with sup commit 900768918490a1040b55e2216f7f5429b2dadf84

Cheers,
Edward

---

From: Tero Tilus <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:00:08 +0300

--
Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/

http://seurakuntavaalit.fi/      1.-5. ja 14.-15.11.
http://www.seurakuntavaki.net/       ehdokas nro 126
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: "Edward Z. Yang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:58:03 -0400

---

From: Ben Walton <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:15:15 -0400

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Sat Jul 31 22:06:34 -0400 2010:

Hi Edward,

> Since this behavior does not seem intentional, I guess it's a
> regression caused by some combination of factors (possibly the new
> backsync branch?)  I'll try to reproduce on a clean Maildir with sup
> commit 900768918490a1040b55e2216f7f5429b2dadf84

Ok, that's interesting.  If it helps, I'm running on 3f9d7d9, with my
conditional Symbol#to_proc patch added...I haven't done a pull since
then although the patch was merged.

This might provide you a useful range for a bisect though...

HTH.
-Ben

--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

---

From: Ben Walton <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:25:38 -0400

Excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of Fri Jul 30 23:28:44 -0400 2010:

> 'Archive automatically'?  I've found keeping then in the inbox was a
> good reminder for following up in the case of lack of response, so
> at least making this configurable would be nice.

HTH.
-Ben

---

From: Tero Tilus <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:31:59 +0300

> Has anyone been able to reproduce this bug on the relevant commit?

I'm running git next and my sent mail gets archived right away.  What
I see by reading the code is that the default SentLoader (which I use)
is hardwired to be "archived", which means the inbox tag is removed
from new messages added to index from that source.

SentLoader has been like that since 2007, but I definitely have seen
my sent mail appear to my inbox up until I updated from e97f535e9 to
927b6bae94.

Does anyone have sent mail showing up in inbox?