Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Recognizing new mails.

From: Gaute Hope <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:34:25 +0100

Excerpts from Ico's message of 2014-03-23 14:15:51 +0100:
> Does sup track read/unread for individual mails? For example, I open a
> thread with 3 mails and read them all. The thread drops from my inbox.

After pressing 'a' right?

> A few hours later I find the thread back in my inbox and open it again,
> it now has 6 mails. How do I know which 3 are the new ones? Only the
> last one is opened by default, but how do I tell which others I still
> need to read?

You probably got this answered on #sup to some degree.

You see the 'N' next to the thread: http://pasteboard.co/1AgBZ9tx.png

> Is there a way to have unread mails unfolded by default?

They are for me..

- gaute

---

From: Ico <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:15:51 +0100

-- 
:wq
^X^Cy^K^X^C^C^C^C
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: Ico Doornekamp <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:57:31 +0100

Sorry for the noise, I caused this problem myself: I use some mail
filtering using procmail to set the 'X-Mark-As-Read: yes' flag for bulk
mail (mailing lists etc) so these do not trigger my you-have-new-mail
bells and whistles. I was kind of confused about the difference between
'new' and 'unread' mail, thus messing up sup's behaviour.

* On 2014-03-23 19:25:00 +0100, Matthieu Rakotojaona wrote:
 
> Weird, on my sup I have all new mails unfolded by default, and the focus
> is on the first one that is unfolded (either because it's unread or
> starred). That state is kept separately for each message indeed, so in
> your scenario it behaves as you expect. What version are you running ?
> 
> You can see which message is unread with the 'N' on each message's top
> line.
>

---

From: Matthieu Rakotojaona <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:25:00 +0100

-- 
Matthieu Rakotojaona