Subject: Re: [sup-talk] renaming label woes

From: Philippe LeCavalier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:01:38 -0500

Excerpts from Philipp Überbacher's message of Tue Feb 15 11:43:13 -0500 2011:
> Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of 2011-02-15 16:26:48 +0100:
> > I changed my mind on a certain label I had setup and wanted to rename it. I first looked at using sup-tweak-labels but opted against that tool since I couldn't figure out how to limit add/remove to a specific set of query results. Instead I loaded sup, performed a search for that label, did !!, T, =, l  and -FF  ff (FF being the label in question). I refreshed the screen to see the changes(@) and the old label(FF) reappeared. I thought it might be some sort of case sensitivity thing so I then did: !!, T, =, l, -FF <enter> and =, l, ff <enter>. When I refreshed that time the change appeared to take. So I closed the buffer.
> > 
> > Now when I search for 'ff' I only get a few threads whereas previously I had over 800. Interestingly enough, If I search by from: or subject...etc. of which I know I'll get a hit within that label the label 'ff' is there as expected. So why can't I search for 'ff' anymore? I'm guessing something with the indexing has gone a-scew. I remembered seeing "Optimizing index..." when looking to do this with sup-tweak-labels so I went ahead and did a dry-run but that didn't help the situation -maybe I shouldn't have done --dry-run? Or maybe I'm way off here ;-)
> > 
> > ...help.
> 
> My experience with sup-tweak-labels today suggests that each run it gets
> only part of the messages. Maybe your problem is similar. Try to search
> for the old labels or try 'L', Enter to see all existing labels.
> 
As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with that returns lots of threads, all properly labeled. Really odd. And broken.
-- 
Thanks,
Phil
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

---

From: Philipp Überbacher <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:43:13 +0100

---

From: Philippe LeCavalier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:26:48 -0500

...help.

---

From: Philipp Überbacher <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:39:11 +0100

> As above, I did that and it only returns a few(11) threads. Doing 'L' and choosing FF or ff shows the same msgs, 11 of them. Still, searching for a thread for which I know should be labeled with th…

This sounds very broken indeed. Which sup version is this? I know as
little about ruby/sup as you do, but others might find the information
useful. Good luck.

---

From: Philippe LeCavalier <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:39:41 -0500

Hi Philipp.
> little about ruby/sup as you do, but others might find the information
Debian testing Squeeze/Wheezy w/Sup 0.12.1
-- 
Thanks,
Phil
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email-masked]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk